Wednesday, May 18, 2011

jennifer aniston cover of gq

jennifer aniston cover of gq. on January 2009 GQ cover.
  • on January 2009 GQ cover.



  • rtdgoldfish
    Mar 28, 11:02 PM
    You might well be right, but good luck trying to explain anything novel and technical to the police if it doesn't involve war-driving or hasn't been featured in the tabloids.

    With the best will in the world, it may also be hard for them to accept your word for it in this matter without independent certified experts or a pre-existing writeup in their manual.

    Wait 10 years, then try again, and you'll have a new generation of young coppers who all played with xbox when they were kids and will understand you perfectly.

    The guy working on my case actually understands most of what I am telling him. He knows quite a bit about networking and how a wireless network works. I did have to explain to one officer that an IP address on a wireless network was not a physical location. I think she thought it was an exact location of where a device was located.

    Well $1000 is grand larceny. Thats not to be taken lightly. Do you know anybody in law enforcement where you live? I would take you're logs that you have made to the police. Ask to sit down with somebody and go over all the logs. Explain it to them like its 3rd grade math.

    Also check the local pawn stores, ask if they have any 360s. First place to look when you get something stolen.

    I've been checking up on the local game shops and a few pawn shops in the area.

    Whoever stole it is still going online with it although they have not played a game. I had the Monster HD cables for the system and they only work on an HD TV. You hook it up to an SD TV and you get no video at all. I think they keep powering up the system and trying to make it work but have no clue what they are doing.





    jennifer aniston cover of gq. jennifer aniston gq cover.
  • jennifer aniston gq cover.



  • Nicolasdec
    Jan 9, 05:05 PM
    http://events.apple.com.edgesuite.net/j47d52oo/event/





    jennifer aniston cover of gq. route of Jennifer Aniston
  • route of Jennifer Aniston



  • RoboCop001
    Apr 5, 03:33 PM
    lol. But when is the Apple Store app going to be released in Canada? Is it available anywhere outside the USA yet?





    jennifer aniston cover of gq. jennifer aniston gq cover
  • jennifer aniston gq cover



  • Kashchei
    Jan 15, 04:58 PM
    Can somebody tell me why there was no update or price drop on ACD? Why is the PRO market left to the most critical point and then updated? Mac Pro is the best example. Its a brilliant machine now but 2 weeks ago? Some of the parts were 2 years old and they still charged the same amount of money for it. Dell, HP etc. are releasing new and updated displays whilst Apple ...........sleeps?


    Quite right! I've been worried since the switch to Intel. Now that Apple is competing head to head with other PC makers, they need to update their product lines at a faster rate (ideally at the same rate as their competitors). Instead, they seem to have taken a step backwards and have decided to update less frequently, which makes little to no sense to me. AAArgh!!!!!





    jennifer aniston cover of gq. jennifer aniston cover
  • jennifer aniston cover



  • NinjaHERO
    Sep 28, 09:16 PM
    If I touch it on the southwest corner will it not work? ;)

    LMAO


    You know what would be funny. What if he is just using this simple house design to calm the neighbors down. They were freaking out about him tearing down the old mansion. Maybe he will build this and leave it up a year or two and then tear it down and build a much bigger house when he doesn't have to submit anything to the association. Seems excessive, but rich people can afford the expensive comedy. :D





    jennifer aniston cover of gq. Bruno on GQ
  • Bruno on GQ



  • kamm
    Apr 12, 08:30 PM
    That was painful to watch. Sort of like Jack Ass: The Geek Edition. Of course they should be banned. Gizmodo was interfering with companies trying to present their products.

    ...which is absolutely fine. In fact it is a form of standing up for corporations, YES.
    Pathetic attempt? Probably, yes, I think so too and also silly but it's still way less disgusting than these ridiculous brainwashed comments here, this incredible hypocrisy people showcase here when it comes to corporations or Apple or anything.
    For God's sake the person who was in charge for the presentation should be fired on the spot. Yes, it's that person, his incompetence that allowed this prank.

    Man, I never visited Gizmodo regularly but thanks for showing me this piece - I will put them into my Google start page. Not because it's funny - it isn't, it's kinda pathetic - but because apparently they have the guts to do things.
    Thanks for the info, again.





    jennifer aniston cover of gq. cover of GQ Magazine#39;s for
  • cover of GQ Magazine#39;s for



  • toddybody
    May 2, 11:27 AM
    Some facts for the learning challenged.

    1. The original DB was set at 2MB. Of ASCII text. As "engineers" you would think Apple would understand and know how "large" that cache is. They claim they didn't realize how much data could be stored in 2MB.

    2. This was brought to their attention over a year ago - not a week ago.

    3. The file should have always been encrypted.

    4. Those getting pissy at people who are calling Apple out on this or are blaming the customer since Apple has it in their EULA that they collect data so it's no big deal should consider that if the switch to turn of Data Roaming FAILED and people were charged up the wazoo - people would be demanding refunds for that data and would demand a fix.

    So don't get all pissy for people who just think that the Location Services on/off switch should actually work. Having it NOT work is actually a violation of the EULA so many of the posters here are using as a defense.


    I'm glad that the OS is being fixed. I'm glad Apple got caught/are responding to "bugs" that they obviously missed during QA.

    +1

    I dont know why people on MR seem hellbent on defending Apple no matter the situation (literally)...its honestly pathetic.




    jennifer aniston cover of gq. Jennifer Aniston - GQ
  • Jennifer Aniston - GQ



  • vincenz
    Mar 17, 05:55 PM
    That happened to me just last week..

    I was answering a call beside a guy at a bus stop who had an evo.. Out of no where he was like "Hey, you better hurry up before that call drops.."

    So I just stared at him for a few seconds and said "Well atleast it wont be because my batteries dead"

    I knew I got him, because he couldnt come up with anything better and just stared at me with depression as if to say "awwww hes right -_-".. :apple:

    Hah awesome! :D





    jennifer aniston cover of gq. Jennifer Aniston graces the
  • Jennifer Aniston graces the



  • Eye4Desyn
    Apr 16, 07:15 AM
    I want My next iPhone to look like this,

    222383

    That would be nice - although I would question the size of apps on home screen and the location of the 3G antenna radio. Would be more convincing if it were up top (iPad 3G cue). Seems like it would conflict with the 30-pin receiver and speaker components.





    jennifer aniston cover of gq. Jennifer Aniston#39;s GQ cover
  • Jennifer Aniston#39;s GQ cover



  • garry12
    Jan 10, 05:27 PM
    But seriously ANY Australian will tell you that Telstra is rubbish.


    I live in Australia and am on the Next G network and, to be honest, it's very disappointing. Coverage drops in and out even in very built up areas. I can't comment very much about the internet because I try to avoid using it as much as I can due to the insane amount of money Telstra charges.

    Hopefully Telstra introduce this at a reasonable price. But, I wouldn't be surprised if it was between $600 - $700.





    jennifer aniston cover of gq. Jennifer Aniston - GQ
  • Jennifer Aniston - GQ



  • themadchemist
    Jan 12, 02:12 PM
    OK, this is funny. Yes, mean, but funny.





    jennifer aniston cover of gq. jennifer aniston gq cover
  • jennifer aniston gq cover



  • dante@sisna.com
    Aug 8, 03:51 PM
    Yes, obviously a 23 inch and a 24 inch cannot be the same panel. You are such a genius. But I wonder.. can a 30 inch apple and a 30 inch dell be the same panel?.. how about a 20 inch apple and a 20 inch dell?.
    But forget all about that.. Are you saying the manufacturer gives apple the superior panels and leave the rejects for Dell?.. So cause Dell panel is 24 inch, they suck compared to apple 23 inch cause logically, since they are not the same size, it implies the Dell panel sucks!!!...

    We must all get together and donate a nobel prize to you. You are such a genius, you make Einstein pale in comparison.

    I don't want to leave you hanging but here's what happens.. The manufacter makes the panels. They cut a panel to apple specs and then the make the exact same panel (or one like it, hopefully, this manufacturer has quality control like every other company and can reproduce panels to exact specifications) and cuts the same panel to 24 inch to dell specifications.
    Simple enough for you Einstein?.

    Hello "Einstein," -- while the panels may be the same, and they are, you should do a bit more research before tagging others with hostility.

    The color management of Apple Cinema HD is superior to that of the Dell due to firmware differences and interaction with Colorsync in the actual OS. We do high-end color management on both 23 and 30" Cinema HD's -- we have a Dell 24 inch as well. Without custom profiles the Dell pales in comparision to the Mac Cinema HD's -- Even with a Custom Profile the Dell is less useful to us as most of our nationwide clients have Mac OS systems with Cinema HD's -- we can send a digital proof and insure that our client sees what we see thanks to the firmware/OS Sync.

    In this respects Dells are very expensive monitors for us to use as they force us to burn physical color prints and FEDEX to clients. We cannot afford this in our job costs. So for our business we'll take the Cheaper, Superior Apple Cinema HD's over the less predictable, more expensive Dell's.

    You really should consider all angles before bashing.

    DJO





    jennifer aniston cover of gq. GQ for the January cover.
  • GQ for the January cover.



  • slabbius
    Nov 24, 08:45 PM
    just ordered a nano





    jennifer aniston cover of gq. jennifer aniston gq spread
  • jennifer aniston gq spread



  • Nekbeth
    Apr 27, 03:06 PM
    Thanks, that's good information. I actually got caught up trying to finish this function of my App but I plan immediately to deep into books and videos that I already have waiting for me. Believe or not, I'm looking forward to it. I know that as soon as give some time to read over fundamentals like the ones you mention.. it will be easier for and easier for all of you to understand my threads.

    So, self refers to my controller.. interesting.





    jennifer aniston cover of gq. jennifer aniston gq cover
  • jennifer aniston gq cover



  • Lurchdubious
    Apr 9, 09:47 PM
    New car for the wife! '08 Honda Odyssey EX-L

    http://imageexp.dealercarsearch.com/Media/2383/H7052460_17.jpg





    jennifer aniston cover of gq. Best jennifer aniston Hair
  • Best jennifer aniston Hair



  • jonnysods
    Mar 26, 01:21 PM
    I jumped in at Tiger. Couldn't believe how amazing it was when I first used it. Then Leopard, so many UI improvements and ways to look at files without opening them. It really does get better with each release....!





    jennifer aniston cover of gq. lovable Jennifer Aniston
  • lovable Jennifer Aniston



  • utazdevl
    Dec 13, 08:22 PM
    For what its worth, when I was at Radio Shack last week talking to the guy about the iPhone trade-in program, he mentioned they were told the iPhone 5 (iPhone 5 being my words) was going to be 4G compatible. I assumed he meant on AT&T and in June 2011. I thought it was odd he would know any details 6 months in advance of release, but perhaps he was briefed because the launch was imminent.





    jennifer aniston cover of gq. and Jennifer Aniston cover
  • and Jennifer Aniston cover



  • Hephaestus
    Mar 17, 05:42 PM
    I bought mine outright for �500 and have a �18 contract that I can cancel an any time. I bought it sim free because I didn't want to get tied in to a long contract with a high monthly bill. Funny thing is, these guys seem more obsessed with the thing than it's actual owners are.

    Typed from my iPhone





    jennifer aniston cover of gq. Jennifer Aniston GQ Photos
  • Jennifer Aniston GQ Photos



  • snebes
    Dec 13, 11:57 AM
    Is this the same Verizon LTE network that takes about 2 minutes to handshake between the LTE and 3G network?

    Yeah, that isn't happening.





    MongoTheGeek
    Nov 16, 12:58 PM
    The Register called shenanigans on this. I would have sent it to Arn to post but the whole thing seems absurd. I'd wager Apple's contract stipulates going all the way to Intel and probably a certain duration as well at least a year of selling all computers with Intel chips.

    AMD somehow got behind Intel in terms of power and I've seen no signs of catch up. Not to say that in a year or two they won't be ahead, but not any time soon.

    Apple won't introduce a AMD based machine until late 2008 at the earliest. I would almost expect a return to PPC first.





    geerlingguy
    Oct 3, 08:46 PM
    PowerBook G5s, of course!

    No, really... I don't think we should expect too much out of the ordinary. iTV, updated iPod(s), new revision of MacBook Pro (perhaps), and Leopard, iLife and iWork updates.

    The .Mac stuff is usually under-the-radar, but I suspect something new will come sometime before the keynote.

    [Edit: I can't spell 'Leopard' - so shoot me.]





    twoodcc
    May 10, 09:39 PM
    It will be easier once you get moved.

    yeah it should be. i'll be there to fix any problems then

    But it's so fun cursing at the thing because you did something wrong and have to reboot into the firmware yet again. Ahhh, but once you get it right it feels good that you only took 3 days this time, the last time took a week or more :p each time gets a little less painful, usually anyway. :rolleyes:

    haha, yeah it can be fun....when it works. not so fun when things aren't working. but i'll get it

    But you loose the bigadv unit every time almost no?

    i wouldn't say that. it seems this is the only area where i've been kinda lucky. i haven't lost as many bigadv units as some, but i have lost a few

    That is true, unfortunately with my new i7980x I haven't gotten any bigadv units yet, I may need to reinstall folding to see if that works, which means losing a normal unit... And most of the problems were before I had folding going anyway.

    yeah i'm sorry to hear no bigadv units for that monster. yeah reinstalling fah might help. let us know how it goes





    amusedchimp
    Oct 6, 03:25 PM
    i live in the san francisco bay area ---berkeley.
    3 years of verizon service >>dropped calls were virtually non-existent
    and the only place i couldn't get service was on trips to the russian river.

    at first my iphone/att worked pretty well in my home
    now...after 1 year the signal in my home has continuously degraded
    and become sporadic
    my dropped call rate at home has consistently increased
    >well over 30% even when the signal indication looks good.

    reception and call retention in the city is spotty at best

    even if this is just due to a dramatic increase in the use of their network ..
    that just means that att has sold services they can't provide.

    I really love my iphone and am sorely regretting that i'm going to have to give it up because of att's unacceptable lack of reliable service





    kdarling
    Mar 28, 10:37 PM
    And please.... don't cry about the 30% margin... it's so freak'n fair by all software distribution practices that is not a reason for any developer not to want to use the AppStore as a channel.

    30% is very good if you usually went through others.

    If you sell the software yourself online, it's not an attractive deal. A big example was the delay in getting Slingplayer on iOS devices. They could not have been happy about losing $10 per each of tens or hundreds of thousands of downloads.

    Obviously, Apple is trying to encourage more Apps to get on iTunes or in the App store. Nothing wrong with that.

    Sure, but the point is that this isn't a new award. It's been going on for years and yet suddenly has this requirement that is blatantly geared towards rewarding only those who also give royalties to Apple.

    It's their right to do so, but greed is not pretty to watch in any case.



    No comments:

    Post a Comment