Friday, May 27, 2011

cherry blossom tree tattoos for women

cherry blossom tree tattoos for women. cherry tree tattoos designs.
  • cherry tree tattoos designs.



  • MadeTheSwitch
    Apr 27, 10:31 AM
    So Trump sounds more like a frightened child scared of what is under the bed more and more each day.






    cherry blossom tree tattoos for women. cherry blossom tree tattoo on
  • cherry blossom tree tattoo on



  • louis Fashion
    Mar 30, 10:29 PM
    Kinda like an Elvis sighting.





    cherry blossom tree tattoos for women. (Cherry Blossom Tree Tattoo
  • (Cherry Blossom Tree Tattoo



  • Geckotek
    Apr 12, 07:39 PM
    My guess, tons of GSM models going to scalpers. Scalpers probably weren't surveyed. :p

    As usual tons if ignorant remarks about CDMA in this thread.





    cherry blossom tree tattoos for women. cherry tree tattoos designs.
  • cherry tree tattoos designs.



  • alent1234
    Mar 25, 08:53 AM
    I once sat on a plane next to an intellectual property lawyer who was commuting to NYC for work from Rochester. As it turned out he had once worked for EK and was now working in the city.

    When I conveyed my surprised over how strange it was that Eastman Kodak was lagging behind in digital imaging and still focused on film considering they were responsible for much of the technology behind digital imaging, he basically inferred that EK's leadership mismanaged their patent goldmine.

    i bet they had people there with MBA's from good schools running financial what if's and telling management to avoid digital because they will make less money due to not selling the film or anything other than the camera





    cherry blossom tree tattoos for women. cherry blossom tree tattoo on
  • cherry blossom tree tattoo on



  • Kryckter
    Mar 28, 06:21 PM
    It's sold out already!

    I just saw that when I got home from work to buy my ticket.

    Pretty upset about this one...





    cherry blossom tree tattoos for women. tree tattoos; cherry blossom
  • tree tattoos; cherry blossom



  • dukebound85
    Apr 12, 01:38 PM
    It's impossible for those who have been oppressed by the majority to be racist

    lol yes it is





    cherry blossom tree tattoos for women. Japanese cherry blossom tree
  • Japanese cherry blossom tree



  • Steve121178
    Apr 13, 10:31 AM
    No matter how much you polish a turd, it's still a turd.

    People like you make me laugh. Office 2011 is great, anyone who says otherwise is wrong.

    Sure, there are alternatives to Office which people may prefer, but Office 2011 is great. Complete and utter fact.





    cherry blossom tree tattoos for women. Cherry blossom tree tattoos
  • Cherry blossom tree tattoos



  • ten-oak-druid
    May 2, 02:27 PM
    I believe it is all statistical variance in manufacturing.

    Get larger sample sizes of each color.

    On a previous thread, the weight of the iphones was found to be slightly different. Some people claimed manufacturing processes are too exact for the difference in mass shown in the pictures posted in the thread. But these people were ignoring the fact that the masses of each color iphone shown in the pictures were less than the mass of the iphone as stated on Apple's site.





    cherry blossom tree tattoos for women. cherry tree tattoos cherry
  • cherry tree tattoos cherry



  • jonnysods
    Mar 28, 09:06 AM
    So exciting. I love the OS roadmap updates.





    cherry blossom tree tattoos for women. Blossom. Cherry. Foot;. Tattoo
  • Blossom. Cherry. Foot;. Tattoo



  • chickenninja
    Apr 6, 10:07 AM
    its real, trust me ;)





    cherry blossom tree tattoos for women. chinese tattoo designs
  • chinese tattoo designs



  • 0815
    Apr 5, 10:45 AM
    If I would leak something, I would make sure the device is clean, the camera is in focus and there is enough light.

    Why are leaked images (almost) always such bad quality?

    High quality images would make it too easy see that it's all fake/mockup/... ... guess that's also the reason for the ugly scratched plastic cover - if the thing would be real he/she would have taken it off for a better picture.

    Macrumors: please move back to page2 or better page99 ... it's too obvious of a fake. I rather see the Wozniak comment on page1 since this has some real content.





    cherry blossom tree tattoos for women. cherry tree tattoos designs.
  • cherry tree tattoos designs.



  • gregorsamsa
    Nov 6, 11:53 AM
    I think we can see it all around us that people are switching. Im a recent switcher myself and have had 2 Macs now in 12 months.

    What im interested in though, is what effect Vista will have on the rate of switchers. Its fairly easy to get a casual PC user to switch on eye candy alone. Will this work when Vista out eye candys OSX?

    Initially perhaps not as great as M$ would wish. For starters, the 6 versions of Vista will be plain confusing for many less-savvy PC owners. Particularly for those with PCs which are in that grey area whereby, for eg. they'll be able to run Vista starter, but not necessarily Vista basic; or they can easily run Vista basic, but Vista premium might struggle, etc. (Similar confusion will abound for some small businesses faced with Vista business or Vista enterprise). Most PCs won't of course be able to run Vista ultimate.

    Then you'll have every hacker in the world subjecting Vista to all sorts of viruses, & currently it's anyone's guess as to how well Vista will cope with the waves of attacks. Added to that you'll have some inevitable bugs, which a Vista SP1 or SP2 may finally fix some 12 to 18 months after launch. Also, you'll have the considerable expense of Vista, particularly when compared to Leopard, & the launch of Leopard sometime in spring 2007 with all the favourable comparisons for Apple that will bring.

    So IMO, if M$ gets their product right on a number of levels (& there are so many variables here), then yes, Vista probably will have a major effect on the number of switchers eventually. But I think Apple could continue to increase marketshare at a good rate for some 12 months at least, if not beyond. - (Also, wouldn't be a bad idea to get dedicated graphics inside some of the consumer-priced Macs most likely to appeal to switchers).





    cherry blossom tree tattoos for women. cherry blossom tree tattoo by
  • cherry blossom tree tattoo by



  • Blue Velvet
    Oct 27, 06:11 PM
    Hope some of you guys will make it to the annual Macrumors London Picnic, usually in July or so. :)





    cherry blossom tree tattoos for women. family tree tattoos design
  • family tree tattoos design



  • CaoCao
    Apr 6, 12:44 AM
    I support increasing gas tax 1�/month





    cherry blossom tree tattoos for women. tattoos trees. cherry trees
  • tattoos trees. cherry trees



  • MyDesktopBroke
    Apr 7, 10:18 PM
    So I guess the GoP stopped studying 1994 after they read "massive Republican gains?"





    cherry blossom tree tattoos for women. Arm cherry blossom tattoos
  • Arm cherry blossom tattoos



  • rovex
    Apr 27, 07:19 AM
    He's better than the McCain would have been in most things, but on a whole he gives in to the Republicans way too much. He passed their healthcare plan instead of one that would actually work, kept Guantanamo open, and as far as "National Security" goes he's about the same as Bush. So basically, he was the best of the two choices, but still not very good.

    "yes he can" lie.

    Obama is a joke. False hope and the naive people didn't think so.

    Trump's hair is seriously the mojo. Love it.





    cherry blossom tree tattoos for women. cherry blossom tree tattoos. Cherry blossom tree tattoo; Cherry blossom tree tattoo. notjustjay. Mar 7, 01:06 AM. I think there are a lot of factors at play
  • cherry blossom tree tattoos. Cherry blossom tree tattoo; Cherry blossom tree tattoo. notjustjay. Mar 7, 01:06 AM. I think there are a lot of factors at play



  • JGowan
    Apr 14, 08:56 PM
    He definitely made a good move. Going from Yahoo to Microsoft and now to Apple... excellent career thus far! Congrats, sir (if you're listening)!





    cherry blossom tree tattoos for women. A cherry Blossom tree couldn#39;t
  • A cherry Blossom tree couldn#39;t



  • eternlgladiator
    Feb 23, 03:45 PM
    oooo high as pos please. was thinking dvd screen shot but it looks pants.

    I chopped the guy out and scaled it up on photoshop to 1920x1200. It doesn't look terrible and you can't really tell there was a person in it. My photoshop skills are a little lacking since I haven't had formal training in about 3 years and am not familiar with all the new stuff it can do. Do you know how I can post a picture on the forum from my computer or do you want to email me? my macrumors name @ gmail





    cherry blossom tree tattoos for women. cherry blossom tree tattoos.
  • cherry blossom tree tattoos.



  • -SD-
    Mar 25, 04:55 AM
    I had a go on Pilotwings earlier in the week at my local GAME. I have to say that the 3D effect is a quite strange. Once you're holding it in the perfect position with the depth slider set just below full, the 3D effect is quite impressive; it really did look like the plane was in front of the screen flying into it.

    I started off with the slider set to zero and increased the depth slowly. It felt really odd to begin with and looked blurry, but once you're concentrating on it then the 3D effect is quite apparent. However, I found that if I looked away for a second my eyes had to refocus which felt quite strange. This is going to be a problem with games where you're constantly having to change your focus between the two screens.

    Overall, my eyes felt strained after only 5 - 10 minutes of playing. I'd like to have a longer go to see if you get used to it, but at the moment I'm not impressed. If your eyes can cope with it, then the 3D effect is quite impressive and I'm sure you'll have loads of fun with it. I certainly wouldn't be letting kids under 10 near it even though Nintendo say 7+.

    :apple:





    mazola
    Sep 25, 11:18 AM
    So when's the next Apple Event?





    MartiNZ
    Apr 12, 06:32 PM
    Thanks for stating the obvious but why would one NOT chose something that is 100% doc and docx compatible with all the Windows counterparts?

    If you need to compose a grocery list or a flier for your next garage sale then iWurk is for you I guess but for the rest of us that actually need to collaborate with other people in the real world, no thanks.

    To be fair the Office '11 apps aren't 100% compatible, or at least not 100% 'exact'. Their preview last year had the guy saying for Word they had printed files out and made sure they were exactly the same between Windows and Mac. Oh how I wish they had done the same with Excel! Graphs, margins, page sizes and how they all relate together STILL cause quite some changes when crossing platforms.





    thatisme
    Mar 29, 12:37 PM
    http://www.the-digital-picture.com/reviews/canon-ef-s-55-250mm-f-4-5.6-is-lens-review.aspx

    go down to COMPARED ..

    now roll over the images.. if you tell me that that 55-250 shot is a 1.6 crop and the 70-X shots are very different you DO live on another plant (the 55-250 shot was manualy zoomed to match the 70-X shot hence the SLIGHT difference in focal length).. I am assuming same camera..as the review is about the lens and the FoV is too close to be recreated beteen full frame and crop.

    you are twisting things nicely around now..

    @Cliff, my bad I remember seen the high speed crop also on the D3 series but I might be wrong. The D700 however does have a crop but also allows you to shoot your DX lens on full frame (which will vignette) but has no speed increase over the full frame mode.

    Thatisme:
    It is kind of funny how you try to wiggle yourself out of this though...
    We (a buddy and me here, pro photographer but you would dismiss this anyway as him not knowing either, are having a great time with your "knowledge" and your way of going from the 200mm debacle to IMAGE... and no, the image will still not be different between an EF-s and an EF lens at the same focal length on the same body.

    End of story..if you are so sure.. why don't YOU prove ME wrong? you posted 1 picture of a modified 5d, which wasnt even yours. there is no 10mm on full frame (hence the vigneting) so you would have to shoot that 52 with the 10-22 at 22mm and then use a full frame 22 milimeter lens and compare it, because you ARE arguing, at least now, that the image will be different. It won't except for the vignetting.. re-read your own statements from before and watch how you ended up now on the "image" :)

    Don't worry, by Monday I will prove it to you but why don't you prove me wrong before?.. I dare you.

    EF-s lens and EF (or DX and FX for me) at the same focal length on the same camera, same f stop, same shutter speed... Exif data intact.


    To the OP: I have to apologize for this and this is the last post related to Thats me from my side:

    To answer your question: EF-s is cheaper as stated before the mess and is targeted specifically for the crop sensor bodies. You CAN fit both EF-s and EF on a crop sensor body and you will get the same image. EF lenses are just made for full frame as also stated before.

    sorry for the mess.

    With your link provided, I agree there is a slight difference there, but as you said, you ASSUME that it was with the same camera.... That would be my assumption as well, however, that example hardly makes your case, as the 70mm had to be manually dialed in... a small change has a big effect at long distances.... just saying... Show it using a prime (can't) or at the long end of the lens where there is no room for error or adjustment (200mm example). Eliminate all variables.

    So, quit your arguing and prove it with a real world example with your gear. I don't own any EF-S lenses anymore, so let's get that in the great wide open, so I can't run this comparison for you. There is a fundamental reason for that, which gets more to the point of the OP... Image quality is flat out crap as compared with Canon's L glass, which just so happens to be only in the EF mount. Right, wrong or somewhere in-between, this discussion has no bearing for me, since I will never own another EF-S lens anyway. To that point, I won't ever own a 1.6 crop camera again either, for what it's worth.

    I have no further interest in this discussion, so have fun. Enjoy.





    neurobound
    Feb 27, 10:02 AM
    In-app purchase can be disabled using parental control. This is stupid. I expect my tax to be used by my government to tackle bigger problems, oh maybe like jobs and the economy, not to appease some idiot "parents."


    That's probably where you and most people misunderstand the role of government. Through the consent of many people, the government is responsible for the current state of our economy, thanks to the high taxation, regulation (more often favoring a large corporation rather than smaller business) and social programs promising far more than they ever could ever practically provide.

    Just ask yourself, with our government spending record amounts of tax dollars. Handing out more unemployment and welfare dollars than ever - more more than any government in the world, by far - shouldn't we be more prosperous than ever?

    These booms and bust's don't just... happen. Give up the faith in this idea that government MICROMANAGEMENT is going to save us. The burden of this economy could swiftly be lifted off our shoulders if people would recognize the necessity to strip funding to all unconstitutional programs. We could be prosperous again if we the people would collectively recognize that to fix these problems, small steps can't be taken, but immediate... radical legislative progress that guts the current budget and corporate favoritism and military empire.

    Regulation isn't inherently a bad thing - it can be a law we all agree on, however if we look more closely at regulation we usually get, it's often a law that's built to favor a particular party, quite often the larger corporation. Shouldn't the law be equal to all? It is for this reason many of us are against so many regulations, they hurt small businesses, and ultimately the average person.

    This isn't about government vs rich as so many people seem to get stuck on. Some of the rich that so many people hate, virtually OWN the government. So why continue to fund their efforts as we have for way too long now?

    The constitution for the united states, if we can't agree on that single document, the law of the land that define's the limits of our government's authority...then what hope do we have to agree on anything?





    Thex1138
    May 16, 05:38 AM
    :-)



    No comments:

    Post a Comment